4.7 Article

Tide gauge records of uplift along the northern Pacific-North American plate boundary, 1937 to 2001

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2001JB001685

关键词

sea level; glacial-isostasy; uplift; postseismic; Alaska tectonics; tide gauge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] Vertical crustal motions at 15 sites along the northern Pacific-North America plate boundary are determined using relative sea level changes from tide gauge records. Our analysis is based on monthly mean sea levels, from which barometric pressure and seasonal effects are removed. The records are corrected for common-mode oceanographic variations. These records are statistically examined for non-linear behavior related to glacial isostatic, tectonic and postseismic effects. To estimate land uplift rates, the local effect of global sea level rise is removed from the relative sea level rates. Slow rates of vertical motion are observed along the southern strike-slip plate boundary. The extremely rapid uplift of the northern strike-slip boundary can be attributed entirely to viscoelastic postglacial rebound associated with tidewater-glacier retreat in Glacier Bay and regional post-Little Ice Age deglaciation. Isostatic modeling indicates a mantle viscosity of similar to2 x 10(19)-5 x 10(19) Pa s, similar to that found elsewhere along the Pacific-North America plate margin. At Yakutat, near the transition of plate motion from strike-slip to subduction, complex non-linear behavior is evident, with a significant change in uplift rate following the 1979 St. Elias earthquake. Non-linear uplift rates are predominant within the 1964 Great Alaskan earthquake near-field. Rapid uplift at Kodiak during a 3.5 year period starting mid-1964 totaled 47 +/- 8 cm. Anchorage, Seward and Seldovia exhibited oscillatory uplift in the period immediately following the earthquake until mid-1972. Since mid-1972, uplift rates have increased steadily at Anchorage, Seward, Cordova, and Valdez. During this period Nikiski and Kodiak show decreasing uplift rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据