4.0 Article

Patient attitudes toward continuity of care

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 163, 期 8, 页码 909-912

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.8.909

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Concern has been raised about managed care's effects on continuity of patient care, but little is known about how much value patients place on continuity. Methods: We surveyed 2500 adult patients of a large New England health maintenance organization about their attitudes toward continuity and their willingness to spend additional time or money to maintain continuity with their primary care physician (PCP). Results: Among the 1171 (46.8%) of patients responding, 460 (39.6%) of 1162 patients had had more than one PCP in the previous 5 years. Nearly all patients (1068 [91.5%] of 1167) rated continuity as very important or important; only 26 (2.2%) rated continuity as unimportant or very unimportant. However, only 256 (22.2%) of 1152 patients were willing to drive more than 60 minutes to maintain continuity with their PCP, and only 200 (18.2%) of 1096 would be willing to spend an additional $20 to $40 per month to maintain it. In multivariable analyses, patients were more willing to drive if they were nonwhite (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.6), older than 50 years (OR, 1.7; 95% Cl, 1.2-2.4), or had less than a college education (OR, 1.6; 95% Cl, 1.2-2.2). Patients who had been forced to change PCPs when their physician moved away were less willing to drive (OR, 0.5; 95% Cl, 0.3-0.8) or spend more money (OR, 0.7; 95% Cl, 0.5-1.0) to maintain continuity. Conclusions: Most patients in this sample indicated that continuity of care was important to them, but reported being unwilling to spend much additional personal time or money to maintain continuity with their current PCP. Nevertheless,an important subset of older and more vulnerable patients reported being more willing to pay to maintain continuity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据