4.7 Article

Phase II study of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor r115777 in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 1760-1766

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.09.075

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [N01-CM-17102-02, CA69912, P30-CA-14599-27] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This phase 11 study was undertaken to define the efficacy and pharmacadynamics of RI 15777, a farnesyl transferase inhibitor, in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients and Methods: Forty-four patients with measurable stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV disease received 193 courses of treatment (median, 2.0; range, I to 22) with R115777 300 mg administered orally twice daily for 21 of every 28 days. Buccal mucosa samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected before and after 8 days of treatment to evaluate inhibition of farnesyl transferase in Vivo. Results: No objective complete or partial responses were documented. Seven patients (16%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 31%) had disease stabilization for greater than 6 months. Median survival was 7.7 months (95% Cl, 6.5 to 10.5) and time to progression was 2.7 months (95% Cl, 1.9 to 3.1). The most severe toxicity was neutropenic (9% grade 3, 7% grade 4) and the most common toxicities were anemia (50% grade 1 or 2, 5% grade 3) and anorexic (50% grade 1 or 2, 2% grade 3). Mild peripheral neuropathy occurred in 25% of patients. Evidence of farnesyl transferase inhibition was documented in 83% of patients. Conclusion: Single-agent 11115777 was well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC, but demonstrated minimal clinical activity. Inhibition of farnesylation in vivo was consistently documented. On the basis of promising results of farnesyl transferase inhibitor combinations with standard chemotherapy agents, future studies of this agent in NSCLC should be in combination with systemic chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据