4.3 Article

Early changes of serum proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

期刊

PANCREAS
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 375-380

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006676-200305000-00011

关键词

acute pancreatitis; cytokines; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-induced pancreatitis provides a model to study the time course of cytokine release during the initiation phase of pancreatitis. The early changes of inflammatory cytokines after ERCP have been unclear. Aims: To evaluate the early changes in serum levels of proinflammatory and antiinflammatory cytokines after FRCP and to assess their value in the early recognition of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Methodology: Seventy-eight consecutive patients undergoing ERCP were prospectively studied. The serum concentrations of tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and interleukin-10 were determined immediately prior to and 1, 4, 8, and 24 hours after ERCP. Results: Seven of 78 patients (9.0%) developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and interleukin-10 significantly increased at 8 and 24 hours but not at 1 and 4 hours after ERCP in patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis, in comparison with patients without pancreatitis. Using a cutoff level of 36 pg/mL for interleukin-6 at 8 hours after ERCP, we found that the sensitivity and specificity for recognition of post-ERCP pancreatitis were 100% and 87%, respectively. Serum levels of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 modestly increased from baseline values, 1 to 24 hours after uncomplicated ERCP. Conclusion: Proinflammatory and antiinflammatory cytokines significantly increased in the early stage after ERCP-induced pancreatitis. Among the inflammatory cytokines; interleukin-6 is the most useful for recognition of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据