4.6 Article

Retinal spectral sensitivity, fur coloration, and urine reflectance in the genus Octodon (Rodentia):: Implications for visual ecology

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 2290-2296

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0670

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To determine the eye's spectral sensitivity in three species of the genus Octodon (order Rodentia; infraorder Caviomorpha), O. degus, O. bridgesi, and O. lunatus, as well as the spectral properties of the animals' fur and urine and of objects in their habitat. The genus is endemic in Chile and contains species with different habitats and circadian patterns (diurnal versus nocturnal). METHODS. The electroretinogram (ERG) was used to record scotopic and photopic spectral sensitivity. The reflectance of ventral and dorsal body parts, urine, and other objects from the natural microhabitat were measured with a fiber-optic spectrometer. RESULTS. In scotopic conditions, the maxima of sensitivity (lambda(max)) were at 505.7 +/- 7.7 nm in O. degus, 501 +/- 7.4 nm in O. bridgesi, and 510.1 +/- 7.4 nm in O. lunatus, representing the rod mechanism. In photopic conditions, only the diurnal species O. degus (common degu) was studied. The degu's photopic sensitivity had a lambda(max) at 500.6 +/- 1.2 nm and contained two cone mechanisms with lambda(max) at 500 run (green, medium-wavelength-sensitive [M] cones) and approximately 360 run (ultraviolet, short-wavelength-sensitive [S] cones). In all three Octodon species, dorsal body parts were more cryptically colored than ventral ones, and ventral body parts had a significant UV reflectance. The fresh urine of O. degus, used for scent marking in various behavioral patterns, was also high in UV reflectance. CONCLUSIONS. It is suggested that territorial urine marks are visual as weft as pheromone cues for UV-sensitive species and hence may have favored the evolution of UV-cones in rodents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据