4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Impact of mass chemotherapy on the morbidity due to soil-transmitted nematodes

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 86, 期 2-3, 页码 197-214

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-706X(03)00035-4

关键词

Ascaris lumbricoides; Trichuris trichiura; Ancylostoma duodenale; Necator americanus; anthelminthics; morbidity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarises current knowledge of the ill-effects of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and takes a detailed look at studies that have been published over the past decade describing the effect of mass anthelminthic use on the health of endemic communities. Mass chemotherapy appears to give maximal returns in terms of improved health in areas where hookworm is a major problem and albendazole is used regularly, along with iron supplements; in children it improves physical growth and iron stores, and in pregnant women it reduces the prevalence of iron-deficiency anaemia. In areas where ascariasis is common, the directly attributable benefits of chemotherapy may be minimal, but it can facilitate the entry of other health care programmes in children, because deworming for ascariasis is often much desired and appreciated by the community. In areas with Vitamin A deficiency and endemic ascariasis, Vitamin A supplementation can be combined with deworming: anthelminthics do not impair Vitamin A absorption but the worms may interfere with Vitamin A uptake by reducing fat absorption. Where trichuriasis is a major problem, single dose chemotherapy may take some time to reduce prevalence, but reduction of heavy infections will reduce the incidence of Trichuris Dysentery Syndrome, probably benefit the learning abilities of affected schoolchildren, and may reduce anaemia and stunting. In general, children should be treated as early as possible, and in areas of very high prevalence, thrice-yearly mass chemotherapy probably improves health better than twice-yearly treatment. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据