4.7 Article

Safety of conservative management and fertility outcome in women with borderline tumors of the ovary

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 1216-1221

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00160-2

关键词

borderline tumor; ovarian tumor; recurrence; survival; fertility; conservative surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the safety of fertility-sparing treatment and the remaining chance of childbearing after surgery. Design: Retrospective clinical study. Setting: Gynecology department of a university teaching hospital. Patient(s): Seventy-five women underwent surgical management in our institution between 1986 and 2001 for borderline tumors of the ovary. Intervention(s): Fifty-nine patients were treated by radical, fertility-compromising surgery. The remaining 16 patients underwent conservative surgery, preserving the uterus and at least some functional ovarian tissue. Seven unilateral adnexectomies, one simple cystectomy, and two adnexectomies associated with contralateral cystectomy were performed. Main Outcome Measure(s): Recurrence, survival, and pregnancy rates. Result(s): The observed recurrence rates after radical and conservative surgery were 0.0% and 18.7%, respectively. No disease-related deaths occurred in any group; there is no significant difference in survival rates. We can report 12 pregnancies in 7 of I I women who underwent fertility-sparing management and who wished to become pregnant. Conclusion(s): In certain circumstances, conservative management offers a safe solution for borderline tumors of the ovary. Recurrence is noted significantly more often after this type of treatment, but all cases of recurrent disease can be detected with close follow-up and can be treated accordingly. No significant change in survival rates was found. Moreover, the pregnancy rate in women desiring pregnancy, those treated conservatively, was as high as 63.6%. (C) 2003 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据