4.4 Article

Sequence variability and candidate gene analysis in two cancer patients with complex clinical outcomes during morphine therapy

期刊

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 677-680

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.31.5.677

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this case report, we present genetic differences in two morphine-related gene sequences, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 ( UGT2B7) and mu opioid receptors (MOR1), in two cancer patients whose clinical responses to morphine were very different [i.e., sensitive ( patient 1) and low responder ( patient 2)]. In addition, allelic variants in the UGT2B7 gene were analyzed in 46 Japanese individuals. Amplified DNA fragments for the two genes of interest were screened using single strand conformation polymorphism and then sequenced. In the UGT2B7 gene, 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNPs) were newly identified with an allelic frequency ranging from 0.022 to 0.978. Six SNPs in the promoter region (A-1302G, T-1295C, T-1111C, G-899A, A-327G, and T-125C) and two coding SNPs ( UGT2B7*2 in exon 2 and C1059G in exon 4) appeared to be consistently linked. Remarkable differences in the nucleotide sequence of UGT2B7 were observed between the two patients; in contrast to patient 1 who had reference alleles at almost SNP positions, but a rare ATTGAT* 2( AT) C haplotype as homozygosity, patient 2 was a homozygous carrier for the predominant GCCAGC* 1( TC) G sequence. Serum morphine and two glucuronide concentrations in patient 2 suggest that the predominant GCCAGC* 1G sequence was not associated with a poor metabolizer phenotype. In the MOR1 gene, patient 1 had no SNPs, whereas patient 2 was a heterozygous carrier for both the G-1784A and A118G alleles. The present study describes substantial differences in genotype patterns of two genes of interest between the two patients. The results necessitate larger trials to confirm these observations in larger case control studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据