4.1 Article

The kinetics of immune reconstitution after cord blood transplantation and selected CD34+ stem cell transplantation in children:: Comparison with bone marrow transplantation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 77, 期 4, 页码 399-407

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/BF02982652

关键词

immune reconstitution; cord blood transplantation; bone marrow transplantation; CD34(+) stem cell transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study compares immune reconstitution after allogeneic cord blood transplantation (CBT) and CD34(+) stem cell transplantation (CD34-SCT) with that after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Eighty-eight children who underwent CBT (20 patients), BMT (58), and CD34-SCT (10) were enrolled, and lymphocytes and T-, B-, and natural killer-lymphocyte subsets were monitored for more than 5 years after transplantation. CBT recipients showed significant increases in (1) total lymphocyte counts (P < .001), (2) CD4(+)/CD8(+) cell ratios (P < .01), (3) CD4(+) and CD4(+)CD45RA(+) cells (P < .001), (4) CD8(+)CD11b(+) cells (P < .001), and (5) CD19(+) and CD19(+)CD5(+) cells (P < .0001) and marked decreases in the frequencies of CD8(+) and CD8(+)CD11b(-) cells (P < .0001). CD34-SCT recipients showed lower lymphocyte counts in the first 6 months and an emergence of lymphocyte and CD4(+)CD45RA(+) cells at approximately 9 months and I year. Both CBT and CD34-SCT recipients showed increased frequencies of CD56(+) cells at I month (CD34-SCT versus BMT, P < .001) but decreased frequencies after 6 months (CBT versus BMT, P < .001). Lymphoproliferative responses to exogenous interleukin 2 were constantly lower in CBT and CD34-SCT recipients than in BMT recipients. These results suggest that the delay in immune reconstitution after CBT in the early phase was mainly qualitative and related to the immaturity of cells, whereas the delay in CD34-SCT was mainly quantitative in the first several months. (C)2003 The Japanese Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据