4.8 Article

Characterization of the effects of pancreatic polypeptide in the regulation of energy balance

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 124, 期 5, 页码 1325-1336

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00216-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Pancreatic polypeptide (PP) belongs to a family of peptides including neuropeptide Y and peptide YY. We examined the role of PP in the regulation of body weight as well as the therapeutic potential of PP. Methods: We measured food intake, gastric emptying, oxygen consumption, and gene expression of hypothalamic neuropeptides, gastric ghrelin, and adipocytokines in mice after administering PP intraperitoneally. Peptide gene expression was also examined in PP-overexpressing mice. Vagal and sympathetic nerve activities were recorded after intravenous administration in rats. Effects of repeated administrations of PP on energy balance and on glucose and lipid metabolism were examined in both ob/ob obese mice and fatty liver Shionogi (FLS)-ob/ob obese mice. Results: Peripherally administered PP induced negative energy balance by decreasing food intake and gastric emptying while increasing energy expenditure. The mechanism involved modification of expression of feeding-regulatory peptides (decrease in orexigenic neuropeptide Y, orexin, and ghrelin along with an increase in anorexigenic urocortin) and activity of the vagovagal or vagosympathetic reflex arc. PP reduced leptin in white adipose tissue and corticotropin-releasing factor gene expression. The expression of gastric ghrelin and hypothalamic orexin was decreased in PP-overexpressing mice. Repeated administrations of PP decreased body weight gain and ameliorated insulin resistance and hyperlipidemia in both ob/ob obese mice and FLS-ob/ob obese mice. Liver enzyme abnormalities in FLS-ob/ob obese mice were also ameliorated by PP. Conclusions: These observations indicate that PP may influence food intake, energy metabolism, and the expression of hypothalamic peptides and gastric ghrelin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据