4.1 Article

Estimation of time of fetal death in the second trimester by placental histopathological examination

期刊

PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 226-232

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s10024-003-8089-9

关键词

fetal demise; histopathology; placenta; stillbirth; time of death

向作者/读者索取更多资源

it has been suggested that certain placental histopathological changes may be useful in predicting the time of death in stillborn fetuses. We retrospectively evaluated 36 placentas from therapeutic terminations in which the time interval between fetal death and delivery was relatively short and well-documented to determine the earliest stillbirth-associated changes and the utility of placental examination in timing death in the second trimester. In each case, termination had been initiated by creating fetal asystole with intracardiac KCl injections. The gestational age ranged from 18-23 wk. The time from asystole to placental delivery range was 2.8-52.0 h. Placental groups were categorized by time intervals from asystole to delivery: 1, < 12 h [n = 4 (11%)]; 11, 12-24 h [n = 15 (42%)]; 111, 24-36 h [n = 14 (39%)]; IV, > 36 h [n = 3 (8%)]. Among eight histopathologic changes involving the umbilical cord or chorionic villi evaluated, only three were present in a significant number of cases and also appeared to be the result of stillbirth. Degeneration of cord vascular smooth muscle was present in 33% of umbilical cords in group 1, but was seen in 100% of cords in groups II-IV; the extent of these changes increased significantly with increasing time intervals. Intravascular karyorrhexis was present in villous blood vessels in 75, 73, 64, and 100%, respectively, for groups I-TV. Villous blood vessel luminal abnormalities were seen in 25, 7, 21, and 67%, respectively, for groups I-IV. These findings indicate that these are the earliest morphological changes in stillbirth in second trimester placentas, but they cannot be used to accurately predict time of death in the relatively short time intervals evaluated in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据