4.5 Article

Effect of extracellular PO2 on the fall in intracellular PO2 in contracting single myocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 94, 期 5, 页码 1964-1970

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00893.2002

关键词

Xenopus laevis; oxidative phosphorylation; myoglobin

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [1 F32 AR-48461, AR-40155] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this investigation was to study the effects of altered extracellular PO2 (PEO2) on the intracellular PO2 (PIO2) response to contractions in single skeletal muscle cells. Single myocytes (n = 12) were dissected from lumbrical muscles of adult female Xenopus laevis and injected with 0.5 mM Pd-meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphine for assessment of PIO2 via phosphorescence quenching. At a PEO2 of similar to20 (low), similar to40 (moderate), and similar to60 (high) Torr, tetanic contractions were induced at a frequency of 0.67 Hz for similar to2 min with a 5-min recovery between bouts ( blocked order design). The PIO2 response to contractions was characterized by a time delay followed by a monoexponential decline to steady-state ( SS) values. The fall in PIO2 to SS values was significantly greater at each progressively greater PEO2 (all P < 0.05). The mean response time (time delay + time constant) was significantly faster in the low (35.2 +/- 5.1 s; P < 0.05 vs. high) and moderate (43.3 +/- 6.4 s; P < 0.05 vs. high) compared with high PEO2 (61.8 +/- 9.4 s) and was correlated positively (r = 0.965) with the net fall in PIO2. However, the initial rate of change of PIO2 (calculated as net fall in PIO2/ time constant) was not different (P > 0.05) among PEO2 trials. These latter data suggest that, over the range of 20-60 Torr, PEO2 does not play a deterministic role in setting the initial metabolic response to contractions in isolated frog myocytes. Additionally, these results suggest that oxidative phosphorylation in these myoglobin-free myocytes may be compromised by PEO2 at values nearing 60 Torr.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据