4.6 Article

Predictability of Vibrio cholerae in Chesapeake Bay

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 5, 页码 2773-2785

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2773-2785.2003

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINR NIH HHS [R01 NR 04257-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vibrio cholerae is autochthonous to natural waters and can pose a health risk when it is consumed via untreated water or contaminated shellfish. The correlation between the occurrence of V. cholerae in Chesapeake Bay and environmental factors was investigated over a 3-year period. Water and plankton samples were collected monthly from five shore sampling sites in northern Chesapeake Bay (January 1998 to February 2000) and from research cruise stations on a north-south transect (summers of 1999 and 2000). Enrichment was used to detect culturable V. cholerae, and 21.1% (n = 427) of the samples were positive. As determined by serology tests, the isolates, did not belong to serogroup 01 or 0139 associated with cholera epidemics. A direct fluorescent-antibody assay was used to detect V. cholerae 01, and 23.8% (n = 412) of the samples were positive. V cholerae was more frequently detected during the warmer months and in northern Chesapeake Bay, where the salinity is lower. Statistical models successfully predicted the presence of V. cholerae as a function of water temperature and salinity. Temperatures above 19degreesC and salinities between 2 and 14 ppt yielded at least a fourfold increase in the number of detectable V. cholerae. The results suggest that salinity variation in Chesapeake Bay or other parameters associated with Susquehanna River inflow contribute to the variability in the occurrence of V. cholerae and that salinity is a useful indicator. Under scenarios of global climate change, increased climate variability, accompanied by higher stream How rates and warmer temperatures, could favor conditions that increase the occurrence of V. cholerae in Chesapeake Bay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据