4.4 Article

Prenatal origin of TEL-AMLI-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children born in California

期刊

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 36-43

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.10199

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01CA89032] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES01896, R01ES09137, P42ES04705] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [K23-80915] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common form of childhood cancer. The peak incidence of ALL between ages 2 and 5 is accounted for by one subtype, referred to as common acute lymphoblastic leukemia (cALL). About 25% of cALL patients have the TEL-AMLI gene fusion derived from the t(12;21) chromosomal translocation. Recent evidence from retrospective analysis of neonatal blood spots (Guthrie cards) in Europe has demonstrated that this chromosome translocation may arise prenatally. The aim of our study was to determine whether TEL-AMLI fusions arise prenatally in a U.S. population of cALL patients. TEL-AMLI-positive cALL cases (n = 14) were identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and the genomic breakpoints were identified by a streamlined long-distance PCR approach and sequenced. Clonotypic primers were designed for each patient breakpoint, and a nested PCR assay was used to determine the presence of the TEL-AMLI fusion sequence in neonatal Guthrie cards. Seven of 14 cases demonstrated clonotypic sequences on the archival Guthrie cards. The oldest patient that was positive was 6.7 years old at the time of diagnosis of leukemia. These results confirm previously published findings of a prenatal origin of TEL-AMLI in Europe by demonstrating its occurrence in a California-born population. Secondary changes were also similar to those described previously, with deletion of the second TEL allele being the most common. Other secondary changes included duplication of the fusion gene, trisomy 21, and monosomy X. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据