4.6 Article

Association between complex coronary artery stenosis and unstable angina and the extent of plaque inflammation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 114, 期 7, 页码 521-527

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00078-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: Patients with unstable coronary syndromes often have complex morphology of coronary stenoses at angiography. We evaluated the association between qualitative assessment of Coronary stenoses and plaque inflammation determined by immunohistochemistry. METHODS: A total of 79 patients with unstable (n = 46) or stable angina (n = 33) underwent directional coronary atherectomy for culprit lesions. Qualitative analysis of coronary angiograms was performed using a modified Ambrose classification. Coronary lesions were categorized as either simple (concentric and eccentric type 1, n = 29) or complex (eccentric type 11 and multiple irregularities, n = 50). Cryostat sections of retrieved atherosclerotic specimens were stained immunohistochemically with monoclonal antibodies, a-actin (smooth muscle cells), CD68 (macrophages), and CD3 (T lymphocytes). The extent of atherosclerotic inflammation within each coronary lesion was determined by the percentage of immunopositive macrophages per total tissue area (including smooth muscle cells) and the number of T lymphocytes per mm(2). RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) percentage of macrophages in atherectomy specimens from patients with unstable angina was greater than in specimens from patients with stable angina (21% +/- 14% vs. 13% +/- 10%, P = 0.01); similar results were seen when complex coronary lesions were compared with simple lesions (23% +/- 13% vs. 9% +/- 8%, P <0.001). In multivariate linear regression models, the combination of unstable angina and lesion complexity was strongly associated with the percentage of plaque macrophages. CONCLUSION: The extent of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation is associated with angiographic grading of coronary lesion complexity and unstable angina. (C) 2003 by Excerpta Medica Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据