4.2 Article

Aphid-host plant interactions: does aphid honeydew exactly reflect the host plant amino acid composition?

期刊

ARTHROPOD-PLANT INTERACTIONS
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 193-199

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11829-011-9128-5

关键词

Amino acids; Phloem sap; Xylem sap; Aphid; Honeydew

资金

  1. Walloon Region Ministry Grant [WALEO2: SOLAPHIDRW/FUSAGX 061/6287]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants provide aphids with unbalanced and low concentrations of amino acids. Likely, intracellular symbionts improve the aphid nutrition by participating to the synthesis of essential amino acids. To compare the aphid amino acid uptakes from the host plant and the aphids amino acid excretion into the honeydew, host plant exudates (phloem + xylem) from infested and uninfested Vicia faba L. plants were compared to the honeydew produced by two aphid species (Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris and Megoura viciae Buckton) feeding on V. faba. Our results show that an aphid infestation modifies the amino acid composition of the infested broad bean plant since the global concentration of amino acids significantly increased in the host plant in response to aphid infestations. Specifically, the concentrations of the two amino acids glutamine and asparagine were strongly enhanced. The amino acid profiles from honeydews were similar for the two aphid species, but the concentrations found in the honeydews were generally lower than those measured in the exudates of infested plants (aphids uptakes). This work also highlights that aphids take large amounts of amino acids from the host plant, especially glutamine and asparagine, which are converted into glutamic and aspartic acids but also into other essential amino acids. The amino acid profiles differed between the host plant exudates and the aphid excretion product. Finally, this study highlights that the pea aphid, a specialist for the V. faba host plant, induced more important modifications into the host plant amino acid composition than the generalist aphid M. viciae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据