4.2 Article

Mechanical damage to pollen aids nutrient acquisition in Heliconius butterflies (Nymphalidae)

期刊

ARTHROPOD-PLANT INTERACTIONS
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 203-208

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11829-009-9074-7

关键词

Pollen feeding; Extra oral digestion; Heliconius; Butterfly; Lepidoptera

资金

  1. Tropical Research Station La Gamba (Costa Rica)
  2. Costa Rican Ministerio del Ambients y Energia
  3. Brackenridge Field Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin (USA)
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 18425 B03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neotropical Heliconius and Laparus butterflies actively collect pollen onto the proboscis and extract nutrients from it. This study investigates the impact of the processing behaviour on the condition of the pollen grains. Pollen samples (n = 72) were collected from proboscides of various Heliconius species and Laparus doris in surrounding habitats of the Tropical Research Station La Gamba (Costa Rica). Examination using a light microscope revealed that pollen loads contained 74.88 +/- A 53.67% of damaged Psychotria pollen, 72.04 +/- A 23.4% of damaged Psiguria/Gurania pollen, and 21.35 +/- A 14.5% of damaged Lantana pollen (numbers represent median +/- A first quartile). Damaged pollen grains showed deformed contours, inhomogeneous and/or leaking contents, or they were empty. Experiments with Heliconius and Laparus doris from a natural population in Costa Rica demonstrated that 200 min of pollen processing behaviour significantly increased the percentage of damaged pollen of Psychotria compared to pollen from anthers (P = 0.015, Z = -2.44, Mann-Whitney U-test). Examination of pollen loads from green house reared Heliconius butterflies resulted in significantly greater amounts of damaged Psiguria pollen after 200 min of processing behaviour compared to pollen from flowers (P < 0.001, Z = -4.583, Mann-Whitney U-test). These results indicate that pollen processing functions as extra oral digestion whereby pollen grains are ruptured to make the content available for ingestion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据