4.5 Article

Tumor necrosis factor receptor type-1 in sensory neurons contributes to induction of chronic enhancement of inflammatory hyperalgesia in rat

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 1847-1852

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02626.x

关键词

chronic pain; inflammatory hyperalgesia; protein kinase c-epsilon; sensory neuron; tumor necrosis factor-alpha

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain lasting hours to days produces a protein kinase C epsilon (PKCepsilon)-dependent 'primed' state lasting several weeks, during which time injection of prostaglandin E-2 induces hyperalgesia which is markedly enhanced and prolonged compared to PGE(2) -induced hyperalgesia in normal 'unprimed' rats. In the present study, we demonstrate that while inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis and antagonism of beta(2) -adrenergic receptors markedly attenuated the hyperalgesia induced by carrageenan, these interventions did not affect hyperalgesic priming. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (rat recombinant; rrTNFalpha), another mediator of carrageenan-induced inflammation, alone produced hyperalgesia and priming, which were attenuated and prevented, respectively, by intrathecal administration of antisense to PKCepsilon. Inhibition of TNFalpha with thalidomide or a rat polyclonal anti-TNFalpha antibody attenuated carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia and prevented priming. Intrathecal administration of antisense to tumour necrosis factor receptor type-1 (TNFR1) reduced the level of TNFR1 transported toward the peripheral terminals of sensory neurons, and attenuated both carrageenan- and rrTNFalpha-induced priming. Acute hyperalgesia induced by carrageenan or rrTNFalpha remained intact in animals treated with TNFR1 antisense. Our results demonstrate that the generation of the primed state does not require production of hyperalgesia and that TNFalpha, which is generated during acute inflammation, can act on sensory neurons to induce hyperalgesic priming by activating neuronal PKCepsilon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据