4.7 Article

Messenger RNA expression for the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor and luteinizing hormone receptor in human oocytes and preimplantation-stage embryos

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 1187-1193

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00071-2

关键词

intracytoplasmic sperm injection; FSH and LH receptors; messenger RNA; reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To study the expression of the FSH and LH receptors in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos and their potential roles in early human development. Design: Clinical and molecular studies. Setting: University hospital IVF center. Patient(s): Female volunteers undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the IVF unit of the Athens University Hospital. All patients gave written informed consent. Intervention(s): Ovarian stimulation was performed with exogenous gonadotropin administration. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed on mature oocytes. Main Outcome Measure(s): Unfertilized oocytes and zygotes and embryos at the 2-cell, 4-cell, morula, and blastocyst stage were selected for study. A polymerase chain reaction methodology was used to analyze human oocytes and embryos. Messenger RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified with FSH and LH receptor specific primers. Result(s): Transcripts for the FSH receptor were detected in oocytes and zygotes and embryos at the 2-cell, morula, and blastocyst stage, while no message was detected in embryos at the 4-cell stage. Transcripts for the LH receptor were observed in oocytes and zygotes and morula- and blastocyst-stage embryos, whereas no message was detected in embryos at the 2-cell and 4-cell stage. Conclusion(s): Messenger RNA for the FSH and LH receptors was observed in oocytes and preimplantation embryos at different stages, indicating a physiological role in the oocyte maturation process and early embryonic development in the human. (C) 2003 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据