4.0 Review

Calpain in the pathophysiology of spinal cord injury: neuroprotection with calpain inhibitors

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 169-185

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0173(03)00152-8

关键词

apoptosis; calpain; calpastatin; caspase; neuroprotection; spinal cord injury

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-31622, NS-38146] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal cord injury (SCI) evokes an increase in intracellular free Ca2+ level resulting in activation of calpain, a Ca2+-dependent cysteine protease, which cleaves many cytoskeletal and myelin proteins. Calpain is widely expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and regulated by calpastatin, an endogenous calpain-specific inhibitor. Calpastatin degraded by overactivation of calpain after SCI may lose its regulatory efficiency. Evidence accumulated over the years indicates that uncontrolled calpain activity mediates the degradation of many cytoskeletal and membrane proteins in the course of neuronal death and contributes to the pathophysiology of SCI. Cleavage of the key cytoskeletal and membrane proteins by calpain is an irreversible process that perturbs the integrity and stability of CNS cells leading to cell death. Calpain in conjunction with caspases, most notably caspase-3, can cause apoptosis of the CNS cells following trauma. Aberrant Ca2+ homeostasis following SCI inevitably activates calpain, which has been shown to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of SCL Therefore, calpain appears to be a potential therapeutic target in SCI. Substantial research effort has been focused upon the development of highly specific inhibitors of calpain and caspase-3 for therapeutic applications. Administration of cell permeable and specific inhibitors of calpain and caspase-3 in experimental animal models of SCI has provided significant neuroprotection, raising the hope that humans suffering from SCI may be treated with these inhibitors in the near future. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据