4.0 Article

Unique Protein Signature of Circulating Microparticles in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 65, 期 10, 页码 2680-2690

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.38065

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Rheumatism Association [R99-A1937, R97-A1028]
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo characterize the unique qualities of proteins associated with circulating subcellular material in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients compared with healthy controls and patients with other chronic autoimmune diseases. MethodsUsing differential centrifugation and high-sensitivity nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, we systematically profiled proteins of microparticles (MPs) from SLE patients (n = 12), systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients (n = 6), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (n = 6), as well as healthy controls (n = 12). ResultsWe identified 531 unique proteins and showed that the differences between healthy controls and patients with SLE with regard to the abundance of 248 proteins were highly statistically significant. Almost half of the proteins that were increased by >2-fold were complement proteins and Ig (increased by 100-4,000 times). MP Ig and complement loads also distinguished SLE from RA and SSc and correlated strongly with clinical SLE severity. Subsets of microtubule proteins, fibronectin, 14-3-3, and desmosomal proteins as well as ficolin 2 and galectin 3 binding protein were also highly increased. In SLE MPs, levels of cytoskeletal, mitochondrial, and organelle proteins, including lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 and transforming growth factor 1, were decreased. ConclusionThe data show that SLE patients have increased numbers of MPs that are heavily tagged for removal and fewer MPs with normal protein composition. SLE MPs are unique and specific proteins that represent novel leads for our understanding of SLE and for the development of new treatments of the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据