4.6 Article

Induction of oxidative DNA damage by arsenite and its trivalent and pentavalent methylated metabolites in cultured human cells and isolated DNA

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 967-974

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgg018

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Even though a well-known human carcinogen the underlying mechanisms of arsenic carcinogenicity are still not fully understood. For arsenite, proposed mechanisms are the interference with DNA repair processes and an increase in reactive oxygen species. Even less is known about the genotoxic potentials of its methylated metabolites monomethylarsonous [MMA(III)] and dimethylarsinous [DMA(III)] acid, monomethylarsonic [MMA(V)] and dimethylarsinic [DMA(V)] acid. Within the present study we compared the induction of oxidative DNA damage by arsenite and its methylated metabolites in cultured human cells and in isolated PM2 DNA, by frequencies of DNA strand breaks and of lesions recognized by the bacterial formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg). Only DMA(III) (greater than or equal to10 muM) generated DNA strand breaks in isolated PM2 DNA. In HeLa S3 cells, short-term incubations (0.5-3 h) with doses as low as 10 nM arsenite induced high frequencies of Fpg-sensitive sites, whereas the induction of oxidative DNA damage after 18 h incubation was rather low. With respect to the methylated metabolites, both trivalent and pentavalent metabolites showed a pronounced induction of Fpg-sensitive sites in the nanomolar or micromolar concentration range, respectively, which was present after both short-term and long-term incubations. Furthermore MMA(III) and DMA(V) generated DNA strand breaks in a concentration-dependent manner. Taken together our results show that very low physiologically relevant doses of arsenite and the methylated metabolites induce high levels of oxidative DNA damage in cultured human cells. Thus, biomethylation of inorganic arsenic may be involved in inorganic arsenic-induced genotoxicity/carcinogenicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据