4.0 Article

A Wnt/β-catenin negative feedback loop inhibits interleukin-1-induced matrix metalloproteinase expression in human articular chondrocytes

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 64, 期 8, 页码 2589-2600

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.34425

关键词

-

资金

  1. BioMedical Materials Institute [P2.02]
  2. Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture, and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The results of recent animal studies suggest that activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in articular chondrocytes might be a driving factor in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) by stimulating, for instance, the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta)induced MMP expression in human chondrocytes. Methods Primary cultures of human, murine, and bovine articular chondrocytes as well as human mesenchymal stem cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts were used in the experiments. Multiple strategies for the activation and inhibition of signaling pathways were utilized. Reporter assays and coimmunoprecipitation were performed to study the interaction between beta-catenin and NF-kappa B. Results In contrast to the role of Wnt/beta-catenin in animal chondrocytes, in human chondrocytes it was a potent inhibitor of MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-13 expression and generic MMP activity both in basal conditions and after IL-1 beta stimulation. This effect was independent of the T cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor family of transcription factors but rather was attributable to an inhibitory proteinprotein interaction between beta-catenin and NF-kappa B. IL-1 beta indirectly activated beta-catenin signaling by inducing canonical Wnt-7B expression and by inhibiting the expression of canonical Wnt antagonists. Conclusion Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in human chondrocytes had an unexpected anticatabolic role by counteracting NF-kappa Bmediated MMP expression induced by IL-1 beta in a negative feedback loop.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据