4.7 Article

Evaluation of mitochondrial DNA content and enzyme levels in tenofovir DF-treated rats, rhesus monkeys and woodchucks

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 217-225

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-3542(03)00005-6

关键词

cytochrome b; mitochondrial DNA; tenofovir DF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The antiviral compound tenofovir DF (Gilead Sciences) was evaluated for possible mitochondrial toxicity in rats, rhesus monkeys and woodchucks. Animals were treated by oral gavage with tenofovir DF, and the levels of mitochondrial enzymes cytochrome c oxidase and citrate synthase were assayed. In rats (6/group) treated daily for 28 days with 300 mg/kg tenofovir DF the enzyme levels were unchanged versus control in liver. kidney. and skeletal muscle. In a parallel study, rats (6/group) were treated with 40 mg/kg of the antiviral adefovir dipivoxil (Gilead Sciences) and enzyme levels were also unchanged versus control. In rhesus monkeys (6/group) treated daily with 30 mg/kg or 250 mg/kg tenofovir DF for 56 days, and in woodchucks (6/group) treated daily with 15 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg tenofovir DF for 90 days, the enzyme levels were unchanged in liver, kidney, skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content was determined in tissue from treated versus control animals by utilizing a quantitative real-time PCR (QPCR) technique, where the relative ratios of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene to the genomic actin gene were measured. The relative mtDNA content from rats, rhesus monkeys and woodchucks were unchanged in the various treatment groups. Variations in mtDNA content between animals in the same treatment group were noted. The actual species-dependent mitochondria/genomic ratios were estimated from the QPCR assay. In summary, treatment with tenofovir DE or with adefovir dipivoxil, did not affect mtDNA content or level of mitochondrial enzymes, and no liver, muscle or renal microscopic abnormalities were observed in tenofovir-treated animals. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据