4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Indoor air pollution and respiratory health in the elderly

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 15S-20S

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00403603

关键词

elderly; indoor pollution; lung function; passive smoking; respiratory symptoms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

People spend about greater than or equal to80-90% of their daily time indoors, elderly people especially at home. Thus, it is important to investigate possible health effects of indoor air pollutants and to consider their contributions to the total human exposure. This report summarises current knowledge on health effects of three common indoor air pollutants, respirable suspended particles, nitrogen dioxide and environmental tobacco smoke, with focus on the adults and the elderly. Preliminary findings on exposure distributions and health effects of these pollutants in older subjects of two panel studies carried out in Italian general populations will also be reported. The two indoor pollution studies were performed in the Po Delta area in North Italy (428 subjects and 140 houses investigated) and in Pisa in Central Italy (761 subjects and 282 houses investigated). Individuals aged greater than or equal to65 yrs spent a significantly larger number of hours at home than the other age groups both in winter and in summer. A trend of higher occurrence of acute respiratory symptoms in the presence of environmental tobacco smoke was shown in comparison to the unexposed elderly both in winter (31 versus 29%,,) and summer (33 versus 16%,). The occurrence of acute respiratory symptoms was consistently higher in relation to the high respirable suspended particles-index exposure compared to low exposure (33 versus 27% in winter, 27 versus 21%,, in summer). Both the presence of environmental tobacco smoke at home and exposure to the high respirable suspended particles-index were associated with a decrease in the mean daily peak expiratory flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据