4.7 Article

Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists'

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 227, 期 2, 页码 469-474

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2272020498

关键词

computers, diagnostic aid; diagnostic, radiology, observer performance; lung, nodule; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA62625] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiologists' performance for determining a distinction between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs without and with use of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three chest radiographs that depicted 31 primary lung cancers and 22 benign nodules were used. The likelihood measure of malignancy for each nodule was determined by using an automated computerized scheme. Sixteen radiologists (nine attending radiologists and seven radiology residents) participated in an observer study in which cases were interpreted first without. and then with use of the scheme. The radiologists' performance was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The mean area under the best-fit binormal receiver operating characteristic curve plotted in the unit square (A(z)) values of radiologists who interpreted images without and with the scheme were 0.743 and 0.817, respectively. The performance of radiologists was improved significantly when the scheme was used (p =.002). However, the performance (A(z) = 0.889) of the computer alone exceeded these results by a substantial margin. The average change in radiologists' confidence level for interpretation without and with the scheme was highly correlated (r = 0.845) with the likelihood measure of malignancy, which was presented as computer output. CONCLUSION: This scheme for computer-aided diagnosis has the potential to improve the accuracy of radiologists' performance in the classification of benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据