4.4 Article

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) cells arise from cranial neural crest and adenohypophy seal regions of the neural plate in the zebrafish, Danio rerio

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 257, 期 1, 页码 140-152

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00039-3

关键词

fate map; lineage; olfactory placode; embryo; Kallmann syndrome; pituitary; dlx3; DiI

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC0421801A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The olfactory placodes generate the primary sensory neurons of the olfactory sensory system. Additionally, the olfactory placodes have been proposed to generate a class of neuroendocrine cells containing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). GnRH is a multifunctional decapeptide essential for the development of secondary sex characteristics in vertebrates as well as a neuromodulator within the central nervous system. Here, we show that endocrine and neuromodulatory GnRH cells arise from two separate, nonolfactory regions in the developing neural plate. Specifically, the neuromodulatory GnRH cells of the terminal nerve arise from the cranial neural crest, and the endocrine GnRH cells of the hypothalamus arise from the adenohypophyseal region of the developing anterior neural plate. Our findings are consistent with cell types generated by the adenohypophysis, a source of endocrine tissue in vertebrate animals, and by neural crest, a source of cells contributing to the cranial nerves. The adenohypophysis arises from a region of the anterior neural plate flanked by the olfactory placode fields at early stages of development, and premigratory cranial neural crest lies adjacent to the caudal edge of the olfactory placode domain [Development 127 (2000), 3645]. Thus, the GnRH cells arise from tissue closely associated with the developing olfactory placode, and their different developmental origins reflect their different functional roles in the adult animal. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据