期刊
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
卷 78, 期 5, 页码 574-578出版社
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
DOI: 10.4065/78.5.574
关键词
-
资金
- Medical Research Council [MC_U950770497] Funding Source: Medline
- MRC [MC_U950770497] Funding Source: UKRI
- Medical Research Council [MC_U950770497] Funding Source: researchfish
Objective: To compare the effects of breathing supplemental oxygen vs air on alleviating motion sickness in healthy adults. Subjects and Methods: Between April and July 2002, 20 healthy subjects were exposed to a provocative motion on 2 occasions (1-week interval) according to a randomized, counterbalanced, crossover design. During motion, subjects rated their nausea (1, no symptoms, to 4, moderate nausea) every 30 seconds. Once mild nausea occurred, subjects began breathing supplemental oxygen or air through a face mask. Motion ceased when moderate nausea occurred, but subjects continued breathing study gases for 5 minutes while recovering. Recovery was assessed for 20 minutes after motion. Results: There were no significant differences in the rate of increase in symptom severity or the rate of recovery between the 2 conditions. Conclusion: Breathing supplemental oxygen had no advantage over breathing air in reducing motion sickness in healthy adults.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据