4.0 Article

Dabigatran, a Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Demonstrates Antifibrotic Effects on Lung Fibroblasts

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 60, 期 11, 页码 3455-3464

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.24935

关键词

-

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim International
  2. NIH [K01-AR-051052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Myofibroblasts are the principal mesenchymal cells responsible for tissue remodeling, collagen deposition, and the restrictive nature of lung parenchyma associated with pulmonary fibrosis. We previously reported that thrombin activates protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1) and induces a myofibroblast phenotype in normal lung fibroblasts resembling the phenotype of scleroderma lung myofibroblasts. We undertook this study to investigate whether a selective direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, interferes with signal transduction in human lung fibroblasts induced by thrombin and mediated via PAR-1. Methods. Lung fibroblast proliferation was analyzed using the Quick Cell Proliferation Assay. Expression and organization of alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) was studied by immunofluorescence staining and immunoblotting. Contractile activity of lung fibroblasts was measured by a collagen gel contraction assay. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and type I collagen expression was analyzed on Western blots. Results. Dabigatran, at concentrations of 50-1,000 ng/ml, inhibited thrombin-induced cell proliferation, a-SMA expression and organization, and the production of collagen and CTGF in normal lung fibroblasts. Moreover, when treated with dabigatran (I mu g/ml), scleroderma lung myofibroblasts produced 6-fold less alpha-SMA, 3-fold less CTGF, and 2-fold less type I collagen compared with untreated cells. Conclusion. Dabigatran restrains important pro-fibrotic events in lung fibroblasts and warrants study as a potential antifibrotic drug for the treatment of fibrosing lung diseases such as scleroderma lung disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据