4.0 Article

Effectiveness of an Early Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment in Patients With Work Disability Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders

期刊

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/art.24609

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To evaluate whether an early cognitive-behavioral treatment complementary to a rheumatologic care program, for patients with recent-onset temporary work disability caused by musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) is effective. Methods. Patients with an MSD-related temporary work disability episode from 3-8 weeks' duration who were in a rheumatologic care program were randomized into a control group (rheumatologic care program) or an intervention group (rheumatologic care program plus cognitive-behavioral treatment). Enrollment lasted 24 months and followup lasted 6-24 months. Efficacy variables included duration of temporary work disability episodes, total number of work days saved, relative efficacy, and relative rate to return to work. An economic evaluation was also performed. Results. One hundred eighty-one patients were included (66 control and 115 intervention patients), generating 222 episodes of MSD-related temporary work disability. Episodes tended to be shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (mean 98 versus 127 days; P = 0.053), with a relative efficacy of 22.9%. There were no differences in duration of the first episode between groups (mean 105 versus 110 days; P = 0.79), but relapse episodes were significantly shorter in the intervention group (mean 63 days versus 197 days; P = 0.0002). Costs were also lower in the intervention group. To save 1 day of temporary work disability, $13.50 had to be invested in the program. Each dollar invested generated a benefit of $4.08. The program had a net benefit of $172,607. Conclusion. Early cognitive-behavioral treatment complementary to a rheumatologic care program is cost-effective, adds >20% efficacy to the rheumatologic care program, and reduces the duration of relapses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据