4.0 Article

The Cannabinoid Receptor CB2 Exerts Antifibrotic Effects in Experimental Dermal Fibrosis

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 60, 期 4, 页码 1129-1136

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.24395

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center of Clinical Research, Erlangen, Germany [A20]
  2. Ernst Jung Foundation Career Support Award of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The cannabinoid receptor CB2 is predominantly expressed in non-neuronal tissue and exerts potent immunomodulatory effects. This study was undertaken to evaluate the role of CB2 in the pathogenesis of dermal fibrosis. Methods. Mice deficient in CB2 (CB2(-/-) mice) and their wild-type littermates (CB2(+/+) mice) were injected with bleomycin to induce experimental fibrosis. Mice were treated with selective agonists and antagonists of CB2. Lesional skin was evaluated for dermal thickness and numbers of infiltrating leukocytes. Bone marrow transplantation experiments were performed. Results. CB2(-/-) mice were more sensitive to bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis than were CB2(+/+) mice, and showed increased dermal thickness. Leukocyte counts were significantly higher in the lesional skin of CB2(+/+) mice. Increased dermal fibrosis was also observed upon treatment with the CB2 antagonist AM-630. In contrast, the selective CB2 agonist JWH-133 reduced leukocyte infiltration and dermal thickening. The phenotype of CB2(-/-) mice was mimicked by transplantation of CB2(-/-) bone marrow into CB2(+/+) mice, whereas CB2(-/-) mice transplanted with bone marrow from CB2(+/+) mice did not display an increased sensitivity to bleomycin-induced fibrosis, indicating that leukocyte expression of CB2 critically influences experimental fibrosis. Conclusion. Our findings indicate that CB2 limits leukocyte infiltration and tissue fibrosis in experimental dermal fibrosis. Since selective CB2 agonists are available and well tolerated, CB2 might be an interesting molecular target for the treatment of early inflammatory stages of systemic sclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据