4.7 Article

Outcomes in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction - Mortality, readmission, and functional decline

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 9, 页码 1510-1518

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00185-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We evaluated the six-month clinical trajectory of patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF), as the natural history of this condition has not been well established. We compared mortality, hospital readmission, and changes in functional status in patients with preserved versus depressed EF. BACKGROUND Although the poor prognosis of HF with depressed EF has been extensively documented, there are only limited and conflicting data concerning clinical outcomes for patients with preserved EF. METHODS We prospectively evaluated 413 patients hospitalized for HF to determine whether EF greater than or equal to 40% was an independent predictor of mortality, readmission, and the combined outcome of functional decline or death. RESULTS After six months, 13% of patients with preserved EF died, compared with 21% of patients with depressed EF (p = 0.02). However, the rates of functional decline were similar among those with preserved and depressed EF (30% vs. 23%, respectively; p = 0.14). After adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, preserved EF was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 0.90; p = 0.02), but there was no difference in the risk of readmission (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.43; p = 0.96) or the odds of functional decline or death (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.72; p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS Heart failure with preserved EF confers a considerable burden on patients, with the risk of readmission, disability, and symptoms subsequent to hospital discharge, comparable to that of HF patients with depressed EF. (C) 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据