3.8 Article

Time- and cell type-specific induction of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β during cerebral ischemia

期刊

MOLECULAR BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 113, 期 1-2, 页码 44-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-328X(03)00085-8

关键词

angiogenesis; pericyte; stroke; receptor tyrosine kinase; vascular permeability; edema

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During cerebral ischemia, angiogenesis occurs inside and around the infarcted area. The growth of new blood vessels may contribute to a better outcome after stroke due to accelerated and increased delivery of nutrients and oxygen to the ischemic tissue. The platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-B/PDGF receptor (PDGFR)-beta system, hitherto thought to contribute mainly to neuroprotection, may also support angiogenesis and vascular remodeling by mediating interactions of endothelial cells with pericytes after cerebral ischemia. While platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-B and its receptor PDGFR-beta are essential factors for the recruitment of pericytes to brain capillaries during embryonic development, their role in blood vessel maturation during cerebral ischemia is not clear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the time course and location of PDGF-B and PDGFR-beta expression in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia. In contrast to the early and continuous induction of PDGF-B, PDGFR-beta mRNA was specifically upregulated in vascular structures in the infarcted area 48 h after occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Immunohistology and confocal microscopy analysis revealed the specific upregulation of PDGFR-beta on blood vessels and suggested expression mainly on pericytes. Our results imply PDGFR-beta as a key factor in vascular remodeling during stroke and suggest that the pleiotropic functions of PDGF-B may be regulated via the expression of its receptor. Influencing the PDGF system therapeutically might improve angiogenesis, cellular protection, and edema inhibition. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据