4.0 Article

Pharmacokinetic study of oral prednisolone compared with intravenous methylprednisolone in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis

期刊

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/art.23341

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR-0048, M01 RR000048-450441, M01 RR000048] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine areas under the curve (AUCs) of oral prednisolone (OP) and intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) and assess the association with nailfold end-row loops (ERLs). Patients with active disease have fewer ERLs that possibly occur in the gastrointestinal tract, impairing absorption of oral medications. Methods. Six patients with juvenile DM received 50 mg/m(2) of OP (day 1) and IVMP (day 2). Blood was drawn at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes, and hourly (hours 2-8) after each dose. Samples were analyzed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography for levels of prednisolone and methylprednisolone. AUCs of OP and IVMP were determined by the trapezoid method; pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained using noncompartmental and compartmental analysis. ERLs were determined from freeze-frame video microscopy and nailfold capillaroscopy. Results. There was a trend toward significance in difference in mean AUC of IVMP (116.72 mu g x ml/hour) compared with OP (65.16 mu g x ml/hour; P = 0.059). Mean peak concentration was higher for IVMP (34.49 mu g/ml) than OP (7.08 mu g/ml); mean half-life was shorter for lVMP (1.90 hours) than OP (2.36 hours). There wits an inverse association between Delta AUCs (IVMP AUC - OP AUC) and ERLs (R = -0.68, P = 0.044). Conclusion. Patients with juvenile DM and ERL loss may have decreased bioavailability of OP compared with lVMP. This can provide the rationale for greater efficacy of IVMP in patients with active vasculopathy of juvenile DM. Further studies investigating the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose IVMP need to be performed in patients with juvenile DM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据