4.5 Article

Monitoring conformational changes of proteins in cells by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 372, 期 -, 页码 33-40

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20030358

关键词

AGC kinases; enhanced acceptor fluorescence; conformational change; dark yellow fluorescent protein (YFPdark); fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET); protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To be able to detect ill situ changes in protein conformation without perturbing the physiological environment would be a major step forward in understanding the precise mechanism occurring in protein interaction. We have developed a novel approach to monitoring conformational changes of proteins in intact cells. A double-labelled fluorescent green fluorescent protein-yellow fluorescent protein (GFP-YFP) fusion protein has been constructed. allowing the exploitation of enhanced-acceptor-fluorescence (EAF)-induced fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Additionally, a novel fusion partner, YFPdark, has been designed to act as a sterically hindered control for EAF-FRET. Any conformational changes will cause a variation in FRET.,which, in turn. is detected by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy ('FLIM'). Protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt, a key component of phosphomositide 3-kinase-mediated signalling, was selected for this purpose. Although conformational changes in PKB/Akt consequent to lipid binding and phosphorylation have been proposed in models, its behaviour in intact cells has not been tractable. We report here that platelet-derived-growth factor ('PDGF') stimulation of NIH3T3 cells expressing the GFP-Akt-YFP construct resulted in a loss of FRET at the plasma membrane and hence a change in PKB/Akt conformation. We also show that the GFP-Akt-YFP construct conserves fully its functional integrity. This novel approach of monitoring the ill situ conformational changes has broad application for other members of the AGC kinase superfamily and other proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据