4.6 Article

Regulation of CD8+ T cells undergoing primary and secondary responses to infection in the same host

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 170, 期 10, 页码 4933-4942

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.10.4933

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI42767, AI50073, AI46653] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naive Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells expand, contract, and become memory cells after infection and/or vaccination. Memory CD8(+) T cells provide faster, more effective secondary responses against repeated exposure to the same pathogen. Using an adoptive transfer system with low numbers of trackable nontransgenic memory CD8(+) T cells, we showed that secondary responses can be comprised of both primary (naive) and secondary (memory) CD8(+) T cells after bacterial (Listeria monocytogenes) and/or viral (lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus) infections. The level of memory CD8(+) T cells present at the time of infection inversely correlated with the magnitude of primary CWT cell responses against the same epitope but directly correlated with the level of protection against infection. However, similar numbers of Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells were found 8 days postinfection no matter how many memory cells were present at the time of infection. Rapid contraction of primary CD8(+) T cell responses was not influenced by the presence of memory CD8(+) T cells. However, contraction of secondary CD8(+) T cell responses was markedly prolonged compared with primary responses in the same host mice. This situation occurred in response to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus or L. monocytogenes infection and for CD8(+) T cell responses against multiple epitopes. The delayed contraction of secondary CD8(+) T cells was also observed after immunization with peptide-coated dendritic cells. Together, the results show that the level of memory CD8(+) T cells influences protective immunity and activation of naive precursors specific for the same epitope but has little impact on the magnitude or program of the CD8(+) T cell response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据