4.0 Article

Correlation Between Dendritic Cell Functional Defect and Spondylarthritis Phenotypes in HLA-B27/Humanβ2-Microglobulin-Transgenic Rat Lines

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 58, 期 11, 页码 3425-3429

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.24023

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01-AR-38319]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [DCSPA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To examine the functional capacity of dendritic cells (DCs) from a panel of HLA-B27/human beta(2)-microglobulin (Hu beta(2)m)-transgenic rat lines and crosses with varying susceptibilities to spondylarthritis (SpA)-like disease. Methods. Mature splenic DCs were isolated from HLA-B27-transgenic, HLA-B7-transgenic, and/or Hu beta(2)m-transgenic rats and tested for support of allogeneic proliferation, compared with nontransgenic controls (all male rats on Lewis background). Graded numbers of DCs were cultured with allogeneic lymph node CD4+ T cells (dark agouti background). Proliferation was assayed by incorporation of tritiated deoxythymidine after 2-4 days of culture. Results. Allogeneic proliferation stimulated by DCs from the healthy HLA-B27/Hu beta(2)m-transgenic line 21-3 and from the healthy Hu beta(2)m-transgenic line 283-2 was weakly decreased (21-3) or close to normal (283-2) as compared with that observed with control nontransgenic Lewis rat DCs. In contrast, the ability of DCs from (21-3 X 283-2)F-1 rats, which develop a dramatic SpA phenotype, to stimulate allogeneic proliferation was markedly defective. When DC-induced allogeneic proliferation was compared among different transgenic lines and crosses with distinct levels of susceptibility to SpA-like disease, stimulatory capacity was inversely correlated with disease susceptibility. Conclusion. In HLA-B27/Hu beta(2)m-transgenic rats, a defective functional capacity of DCs correlates with susceptibility to SpA. Since it was previously demonstrated that defective DC function is not a consequence of disease, it could well be a principal factor in the spontaneous development of SpA in these lines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据