4.6 Article

Differentiation of bone marrow cells into cells that express liver-specific genes in vitro: implication of the Notch signals in differentiation

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00637-5

关键词

bone marrow; stem cell; HGF; negative selection; Notch-1; Jagged-1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone marrow (BM) stem cells have been shown to differentiate into liver cells. It remains difficult to sort and culture BM stem cells. and the gene expression of liver-specific proteins in these cells has not been fully investigated. We used a negative selective magnetic cell separation system to obtain stem cell-enriched BM cells. The cells obtained were cultured with hepatocytes or with hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and the differentiation of BM cells into cells expressing liver-specific genes, hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF) 1alpha, cytokeratin (CK) 8, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and albumin was investigated by the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. We also investigated the gene expressions of Notch receptor-1 (Notch-1) and its ligand Jagged-1 in BM cell differentiation. Sorted BM cells showed positive for Sca-1 (Ataxin-1) by immunofluorescence staining. Fluorescence activated cell sorter analysis showed that 32.6% of sorted BM cells had a high level of expression of the hematopoietic stem cell marker CD90 (Thy-1). When cultured with hepatocytes, these cells expressed the liver-specific genes HNF1alpha and CK8 on culture day 3. AFP and albumin on culture day 7. When cultured with HGF (20 ng/ml), the cells expressed HNF1alpha on day 3 and CK8 on day 7. Gene expressions of Notch-1 and Jagged-1 were detected in cultured BM cells on day 3. These results suggest that the negative selective magnetic cell separation system is useful for the rapid preparation of stem cell-enriched BM cells, and that the Notch signaling pathway plays a role in BM cell differentiation into a hepatocyte lineage in vitro. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据