4.6 Article

Structure and intermolecular interactions of the luminal dimerization domain of human IRE1α

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 278, 期 20, 页码 17680-17687

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M300418200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL52173] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accumulation of unfolded proteins in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum activates a signal transduction cascade that culminates in the transcriptional induction of genes encoding adaptive functions. One proximal sensor for this unfolded protein response is the protein kinase/endoribonuclease IRE1alpha. IRE1alpha is a type-I transmembrane glycoprotein for which the N-terminal luminal domain (NLD) senses the accumulation of unfolded proteins. Previously we demonstrated that the NLD forms a stable ligand-independent dimer linked by disulfide bridges. In this report we have identified the cysteine residues responsible for intermolecular disulfide bonding. However, this covalent interaction was not required for dimerization and/or signaling, suggesting that a cryptic dimer interface exists in the NLD that is independent of covalent disulfide interactions. Limited proteolysis of the NLD revealed characteristic fragments, all retaining the same N-terminal sequences as full-length NLD. Biochemical and functional studies using NLD truncation mutants indicated that the dimerization domain of the NLD is confined to the conserved motifs at the N-terminal regions where putative hydrophobic interactions exist. In addition, the peptide binding domain of the endoplasmic reticulum protein chaperone BiP interacted with the N-terminal region within the NLD. Our findings suggest that the NLD has at least two distinct types of interactions mediating dimerization and function in signaling, i.e. covalent interactions involving disulfide bond formation and hydrophobic interactions, with the hydrophobic interaction being the driving force for dimerization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据