4.8 Article

Polymeric micelles of poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)-block-poly(ε-caprolactone) copolymer as a carrier for paclitaxel

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 89, 期 3, 页码 437-446

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00162-7

关键词

paclitaxel; amphiphilic block copolymers; poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline); polymeric micelles; hemolysis; cell growth inhibition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymeric micelles based on amphiphilic block copolymers of poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEtOz) and poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) were prepared in an aqueous phase. The loading of paclitaxel into PEtOz-PCL micelles was confirmed by H-1-NMR spectra. Paclitaxel was efficiently loaded into PEtOz-PCL micelles using dialysis method, and the loading content of paclitaxel in micelles was in the range 0.5-7.6 wt.% depending on the block composition of block copolymers, organic solvent used in the dialysis, and feed weight ratio of paclitaxel to block copolymer. The higher the content of hydrophobic block in the block copolymers, the higher the loading efficiency of micelles for paclitaxel. When acetonitrile was used as solvent, a higher drug loading efficiency was obtained than with THF. The loading efficiency decreased with increasing feed weight ratio of paclitaxel to block copolymer from 0.1:1 to 0.2:1. The hydrodynamic diameters of paclitaxel-loaded micelles were in the range 18.3-23.4 nm with narrow size distribution. The hemolysis test of PEtOz-PCL performed in vitro indicated that the toxicity of PEtOz-PCLs to lipid membrane was not significant compared with Tween 80, and was comparable to that observed with Cremophore EL. The proliferation inhibition activity of paclitaxel-loaded micelles for KB human epidermoid carcinoma cells was also evaluated in vitro. Paclitaxel-entrapped polymeric micelles exhibited comparable activity to that observed with Cremophore EL-based paclitaxel formulations in inhibiting the growth of KB cells. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据