4.8 Article

Variants of toll-like receptor 4 modify the efficacy of statin therapy and the risk of cardiovascular events

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 107, 期 19, 页码 2416-2421

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000068311.40161.28

关键词

atherosclerosis; statins; cardiovascular diseases; inflammation; receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Atherosclerosis is increasingly considered to be a chronic inflammatory process. We examined whether genetic variants of the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), which are correlated with impaired innate immunity and with progression of carotid atherosclerosis, are also associated with coronary atherosclerosis and predict the risk of cardiovascular events. Methods and Results-Two polymorphisms of the TLR4 gene (Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile) were determined in 655 men with angiographically documented coronary atherosclerosis. All patients participated in a prospective cholesterol-lowering trial evaluating the effect on coronary artery disease and were randomly assigned to either pravastatin or placebo for 2 years. There were no significant differences between genetically defined subgroups with respect to baseline risk factors, treatment, or in-trial changes of lipid, lipoprotein, or angiographic measurements. Genotype was not associated with progression of atherosclerosis. In the pravastatin group, 299Gly carriers had a lower risk of cardiovascular events during follow-up than noncarriers (2.0% versus 11.5%, P=0.045). Among noncarriers, pravastatin reduced the risk of cardiovascular events from 18.1% to 11.5% (P=0.03), whereas among 299Gly carriers this risk was strikingly reduced from 29.6% to 2.0% (P=0.0002, P=0.025 for interaction). Conclusions-Among symptomatic men with documented coronary artery disease, the TLR4 Asp299Gly polymorphism was associated with the risk of cardiovascular events. This variant also modified the efficacy of pravastatin in preventing cardiovascular events, such that carriers of the variant allele had significantly more benefit from pravastatin treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据