4.7 Article

Ages and metallicities of eight star clusters and their surrounding fields in the inner disc of the Large Magellanic Cloud

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06408.x

关键词

techniques : photometric; Magellanic Clouds; galaxies : star clusters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present Washington system colour-magnitude diagrams for 8 star clusters and their surrounding fields which, with one exception, lie within the inner parts of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) disc. Careful attention is paid to separating out the cluster and field star distributions. Ages and metallicities are then determined in a consistent manner for both populations in two different ways. We first compare the colour-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) with new theoretical isochrones in the Washington system. We also derive ages using the magnitude difference between the red clump and the turnoff, and derive metallicities by comparing the giant branches to standard calibrating clusters. For this latter metallicity derivation, we present age-dependent metallicity corrections for intermediate age clusters (IACs) based on the new isochrones. The two methods for both age and metallicity determination are in good agreement with each other. All clusters are found to be IACs (1-3 Gyr), with [Fe/H] from -0.4 to -0.9. We find that the stellar population of each star cluster is generally quite similar to that of the field where it is embedded, sharing its mean age and metallicity. Combining the present sample with a revision of that of Bica et al. studied similarly, we find that our metallicities for IACs are intermediate in metallicity to those for clusters of similar age studied by Olszewski et al. and by Beasley, Hoyle & Sharples. A combined age-metallicity relation is presented which shows that LMC clusters formed between 1-3 Gyr ago with a mean metallicity (-0.5 dex) and metallicity spread (0.23 dex) independent of age. Good agreement is found with the bursting model of Pagel & Tautvaiviene. No evidence for a metallicity gradient is found.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据