4.7 Article

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of glutamate release from rat hippocampal synaptosomes

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 469, 期 1-3, 页码 47-55

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01734-5

关键词

cannabinoid; exocytotic release; hippocampus; nerve terminal; Ca2+ channel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cannabinoid receptors are widely expressed in the brain and have been shown to regulate synaptic transmission through a presynaptic mechanism. Using synaptosomal preparation, I show here that 2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinyl-methyl)-pyrrolo-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl-1-naphthalenylmethanone (WIN 55212-2) strongly depressed 4-aminopyridine-evoked glutamate release in a concentration-dependent manner, and this effect was reversed by the selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-4-methyl-N-4-morpholinyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM 281). The inhibitory modulation by WIN 55212-2 was not due to a decrease in synaptosomal excitability or a direct effect on the release machinery because WIN 55212-2 did not alter 4-aminopyridine-mediated depolarization and ionomycin-induced glutamate release. In addition, the WIN 55212-2-mediated inhibition of glutamate release was blocked by the G(i)/G(o) protein inhibitor pertussis toxin, but not by the protein kinase A inhibitor 2,3,9,10,11,12-Hexahydro-10-hydroxy-9-methyl-1-oxo-9,12-epoxy-1H-diindolo-benzodiazocine-10-carboxylic acid, hexyl ester (KT 5720). Furthermore, this inhibitory effect was associated with a decrease in 4-aminopyridine-evoked Ca2+ influx, which could be completely prevented in synaptosomes pretreated with the N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channel blockers. Together, these observations indicate that activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors inhibit 4-aminopyridie-evoked glutamate release from hippocampal synaptosomes through a inhibitory G protein to suppress N- and P/Q-type Ca2+ channel activity. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据