4.5 Article

In situ studies of ultrasound-stimulated fat crystallization using synchrotron radiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 107, 期 21, 页码 4927-4935

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp027840f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The crystallization behavior of tripalmitin (PPP) and trilaurin (LLL) without and with the application of ultrasonic power is investigated in situ using synchrotron radiation time-resolved small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) simultaneous measurement. Without ultrasound application, both polymorphic forms beta' and beta crystallized in the melt of each substance. With ultrasound treatment of the melt, the following effects were observed: (i) a marked decrease of induction times for crystallization of both PPP and LLL, (ii) an increased nucleation rate, and (iii) a crystallization of only the form for both PPP and LLL under conditions of initial crystallization temperatures of 50 and 30 degreesC, respectively, and applied ultrasound of 2 s. The last finding demonstrates that ultrasound irradiation can be used as an efficient tool for controlling the polymorphic crystallization of fats. In addition to this, the crystallization of LLL under a lower initial crystallization temperature of 25 degreesC and with the same ultrasonication time of 2 s, revealed the presence of both beta' and beta polymorphs. This suggests that the crystallization of only the beta form depends not only on ultrasound treatment but also on the initial temperature of crystallization. On the basis of the dynamic nucleation of PPP and LLL crystals induced by collapsing caviatation bubbles, we argue that a pronounced decline in induction times and an increase in the nucleation rate result from the shift in the melting points due to high-pressure pulses associated with collapsing bubbles. The insufficiency of this approach in accounting for the nucleation of only the beta polymorph or both beta' and polymorphs was also considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据