4.7 Article

Polymerase Delta Interacting Protein 2 Sustains Vascular Structure and Function

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301913

关键词

blood vessel; extracellular matrix; hydrogen peroxide; Nox4; Poldip2

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL38206, HL095070, HL058863, DK074518, HL102167, HL070531]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Research Service of the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-On the basis of previous evidence that polymerase delta interacting protein 2 (Poldip2) increases reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase 4 (Nox4) activity in vascular smooth muscle cells, we hypothesized that in vivo knockdown of Poldip2 would inhibit reactive oxygen species production and alter vascular function. Approach and Results-Because homozygous Poldip2 deletion is lethal, Poldip2(+/-) mice were used. Poldip2 mRNA and protein levels were reduced by approximate to 50% in Poldip2(+/-) aorta, with no change in p22phox, Nox1, Nox2, and Nox4 mRNAs. NADPH oxidase activity was also inhibited in Poldip2(+/-) tissue. Isolated aortas from Poldip2(+/-) mice demonstrated impaired phenylephrine and potassium chloride-induced contractions, increased stiffness, and reduced compliance associated with disruption of elastic lamellae and excessive extracellular matrix deposition. Collagen I secretion was elevated in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells from Poldip2(+/-) mice and restored by H2O2 supplementation, suggesting that this novel function of Poldip2 is mediated by reactive oxygen species. Furthermore, Poldip2(+/-) mice were protected against aortic dilatation in a model of experimental aneurysm, an effect consistent with increased collagen secretion. Conclusions-Poldip2 knockdown reduces H2O2 production in vivo, leading to increases in extracellular matrix, greater vascular stiffness, and impaired agonist-mediated contraction. Thus, unaltered expression of Poldip2 is necessary for vascular integrity and function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据