4.5 Article

Use of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ ligand troglitazone as treatment for refractory breast cancer:: a phase II study

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 391-397

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024038127156

关键词

breast cancer clinical trials; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR); thiazolidinediones; troglitazone

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To evaluate the therapeutic effects of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR). activating ligand, troglitazone, in patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer. Experimental design. Patients with advanced breast cancer refractory to at least one chemotherapy regimen (ER negative tumors) or two hormonal regimens (ER positive tumors) were treated with troglitazone at 800 mg PO QD until disease progression, to determine the percentage of patients free of progression at 6 months. Tumor response, toxicity, and changes in serum tumormarkers (CEA, CA27.29) that might reflect alteration in tumor differentiation, were also examined. Results. Twenty-two patients were enrolled before suspension of protocol accrual and treatment when troglitazone was withdrawn from commercial availability following FDA warnings on hepatic toxicity. No objective responses (CR or PR) were observed; only three patients had SD at 8 weeks. Patients came off study for PD (16), DLT (1), FDA withdrawal (2), or other (3) reasons. No patients took troglitazone for more than 20 weeks; all had experienced disease progression or began other systemic therapy within 6 months. All patients with elevated serum tumor markers (CEA and CA27.29) at baseline had rising tumor markers within 8 weeks. Conclusions. While clinical trials among different patient populations might uncover subtle effects on tumor differentiation, PPAR. activation by troglitazone has little apparent clinical value among patients with treatment-refractory metastatic breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据