4.7 Article

The Synaptic Proteins β-Neurexin and Neuroligin Synergize With Extracellular Matrix-Binding Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A During Zebrafish Vascular Development

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.243006

关键词

neurexins; neuroligins; vascular endothelial growth factor A; extracellular matrix; vascular system

资金

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [IG 11503]
  2. Regione Piemonte
  3. Cassa di Risparmio di Torino Foundation
  4. Italian Ministry of Health
  5. Regione Lombardia [16796/SAL-01]
  6. Progetto Cariplo NOBEL (Biological and molecular characterization of cancer stem cells)
  7. Adriano Buzzati-Traverso foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-The goal of this study was to determine the in vivo functions of the synaptic proteins neurexins and neuroligins in embryonic vascular system development using zebrafish as animal model. Methods and Results-In the present study, we show that the knockdown of the alpha-form of neurexin 1a induces balance defects and reduced locomotory activity, whereas beta-neurexin 1a and neuroligin 1 morphants present defects in sprouting angiogenesis and vascular remodeling, in particular in the caudal plexus and subintestinal vessels. Coinjection of low doses of morpholinos for beta-neurexin 1a and neuroligin 1 together or in combination with morpholinos targeting the heparin-binding isoforms of vascular endothelial growth factor A (encoded by the VEGFAb gene) recapitulates the observed abnormalities, suggesting synergistic activity of these molecules. Similar coinjection experiments with morpholinos, targeting the enzyme heparan sulfate 6-O-sulfotransferase 2, confirm the presence of a functional correlation between extracellular matrix maturation and beta-neurexin 1a or neuroligin 1. Conclusion-Our data represent the first in vivo evidence of the role of neurexin and neuroligin in embryonic blood vessel formation and provide insights into their mechanism of action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据