4.7 Article

Disruption of Endothelial Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Accelerates Diet-Induced Atherogenesis in LDL Receptor-Null Mice

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.239137

关键词

atherosclerosis; endothelial function; hypertension; lipids; lipoproteins

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health [CA148828]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) is widely expressed in vessel walls, and it's activation by agonists showed beneficial effects in cardiovascular diseases. However, the role of endothelial cell (EC) PPAR gamma in atherogenesis is not fully understood. Methods and Results-To assess the contribution of endothelial-specific PPAR gamma in atherosclerosis, EC-specific PPAR gamma disruption and LDL receptor (LDLR) double-knockout (PPAR gamma(Delta EC)/LDLR-/-) mice were developed. When challenged with a high-cholesterol diet for 4 weeks, PPAR gamma(Delta EC)/LDLR-/- mice exhibited severe atherosclerotic lesions compared to either their littermate controls or macrophage-specific PPAR gamma disruption and LDLR double knockout (PPAR gamma(Delta M Phi)/LDLR-/-) mice. Metabolic analysis showed severe dyslipidemia and significant increase in systolic blood pressure in the PPAR gamma(Delta EC)/LDLR-/- mice. Histological analysis and real-time quantitative PCR suggested an exacerbated inflammation in PPAR gamma(Delta EC)/LDLR-/- mice, as revealed by the increases of proinflammatory gene expression and macrophage infiltration in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo endothelial permeability was also increased by endothelial PPAR gamma disruption. Bone-marrow transplantation studies, which reconstituted hematopoietic PPAR gamma, demonstrated that the accelerated atherogenesis was due to endothelial PPAR gamma deficiency. Conclusion-Endothelial PPAR gamma plays an important protective role in atherogenesis. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:65-73.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据