4.7 Article

Oxidative Stress-Induced Degradation of Thioredoxin-1 and Apoptosis Is Inhibited by Thioredoxin-1-Actin Interaction in Endothelial Cells

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.218982

关键词

apoptosis; thioredoxin-1; actin; oxidative stress; stress fibers

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HA-2868/3-2, HA2868/3-3]
  2. University of Duesseldorf
  3. Leducq Transatlantic Network of Excellence [09 CVD_01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Thioredoxin-1 (Trx-1), one important antioxidative enzyme in endothelial cells, is required for apoptosis inhibition. Apoptosis induction is dependent on cytoskeletal changes, which depend on actin rearrangements. Therefore, we wanted to elucidate whether a physical interaction exists between Trx-1 and actin and what the functional consequences are. Methods and Results-Combined immunoprecipitation/mass spectrometry identified actin as a new binding partner for Trx-1. A separate pool of Trx-1 forms a complex with apoptosis signaling kinase 1. Actin is required for stress fiber formation; thus, the interaction of actin with Trx-1 might interfere with this process. Stress fiber formation, which is directly linked to the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), occurs as early as 1 hour after H2O2 treatment. It is inhibited by Trx-1 overexpression, treatment with exogenous Trx-1, or inhibition of FAK. Prolonged incubation with H2O2 induced stress fiber formation, reduced Trx-1 protein levels, and increased apoptosis. All these processes were inhibited by preincubation with the FAK inhibitor PF573228. On the contrary, incubation with PF573228 1 hour after H2O2 treatment did not block stress fiber formation, degradation of Trx-1, or apoptosis. Conclusion-These data demonstrate that the actin-Trx-1 complex protects Trx-1 from degradation and, thus, endothelial cells from apoptosis. Reciprocally, Trx-1 prevents stress fiber formation. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:650-656.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据