4.7 Article

Biomarkers of the Osteoprotegerin Pathway Clinical Correlates, Subclinical Disease, Incident Cardiovascular Disease, and Mortality

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.199661

关键词

coronary heart disease; vascular biology; osteoprotegerin; receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC-25195]
  2. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  3. [R01-HL076784]
  4. [1R01-AG028321]
  5. [R01-HL064753]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Experimental evidence identified the osteoprotegerin (OPG)/receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK)/RANK ligand (RANKL) pathway as a candidate system modulating vascular remodeling and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods and Results-Serum concentrations of OPG and RANKL were measured in 3250 Framingham Study participants (54% women, 61 +/- 9 years). During a mean follow-up of 4.6 years, 143 (of 3084 free of CVD at baseline) participants developed a first CVD event, and 235 died. In multivariable models, OPG was associated with increased hazards for incident CVD and mortality (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.54; and hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.47, per 1-SD increment in log-OPG, respectively). Log-OPG was positively related to multiple CVD risk factors, including age, smoking, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, and prevalent CVD. In a subsample (n=1264), the prevalence of coronary artery calcification, measured by computed tomography, increased nonsignificantly with OPG quartiles. RANKL concentrations displayed inverse associations with multiple CVD risk factors, including smoking, diabetes, and antihypertensive treatment, and were not related to coronary artery calcification or incident CVD or mortality. Conclusion-Our prospective data reinforce OPG as marker for CVD risk factor burden and predictor for CVD and mortality in the community. (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010; 30: 1849-1854.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据